The worst book he has written

What happened to Gibson? The premise seemed interesting but the execution is poor. The resolution is completely unsatisfactory. The crux of the book, the fact-finding of a particular piece of information, is not even done by the character in the book ,but is simply handed to her in exchange for a favor. The suspenion of reality is fine, but at least provide a better resolution. THe main character is just fed info, like a computer and she reacts to it. There was no self-discovery or interesting explanations. IT was awful. Read Neuromancer, much better. or cryptonomicon by neal stephenson.